"Planners versus pants" can be a useful way of looking at how to write stories, but we have to stop making it the writing methodology.

I’m sure this isn’t the first time someone has mentioned this, whether on this subwoofer or elsewhere. Recently, it seems that the notion of planners vs underpants, architects vs gardeners, etc., has become popular as a way to categorize how people write. I was first introduced to the concept while watching one of Brandon Sanderson’s BYU lectures on YouTube, and it seems like I’ve seen the concept discussed everywhere ever since. Famous authors are now seen by the “field” they were / are in, and everyone is eager to find out which method works best for them. And my argument is that we have to move on. Making writing a black and white matter, or believing that it exists on a spectrum between two extremes (as some do, putting themselves in the middle and using the term “hybrid”), denies the power of writing as art. I’m sure we could similarly divide great writers into those who drank coffee and those who didn’t, or pinpoint an author’s success or failure based on what time they woke up in the morning. I just think that writing is much more complex than a specific aspect. In short, planning versus not planning is not the defining characteristic of writing, it is just one characteristic of many, and I think we need to move on.

I’m sure this isn’t the first time someone has mentioned this, whether on this subwoofer or elsewhere. Recently, it seems that the notion of planners vs underpants, architects vs gardeners, etc., has become popular as a way to categorize how people write. I was first introduced to the concept while watching one of Brandon Sanderson’s BYU lectures on YouTube, and it seems like I’ve seen the concept discussed everywhere ever since. Famous authors are now seen by the “field” they were / are in, and everyone is eager to find out which method works best for them. And my argument is that we have to move on. Making writing a black and white matter, or believing that it exists on a spectrum between two extremes (as some do, putting themselves in the middle and using the term “hybrid”), denies the power of writing as art. I’m sure we could similarly divide great writers into those who drank coffee and those who didn’t, or pinpoint an author’s success or failure based on what time they woke up in the morning. I just think that writing is much more complex than a specific aspect. In short, planning versus not planning is not the defining characteristic of writing, it is just one characteristic of many, and I think we need to move on.

If you require to relish the White Vivification: Making money in the solace of your own internal composition online, then this is for YOU!: Click Here